Archive | Insurance Company News – California

Obamacare Premiums Expected To Rise Sharply Amid Insurer Losses

Health insurance companies are laying the groundwork for substantial increases in ObamaCare premiums, opening up a line of attack for Republicans in a presidential election year.

Many insurers have been losing money on the ObamaCare marketplaces, in part because they set their premiums too low when the plans started in 2014. The companies are now expected to seek substantial price increases.

“There are absolutely some carriers that are going to have to come in with some pretty significant price hikes to make up for the underpricing that they did before,” said Sabrina Corlette, a professor at Georgetown University’s Center on Health Insurance Reforms, while noting that the final picture remains unclear.

Insurers are already making the case for premium increases, pointing to a pool of enrollees that is smaller, sicker and costlier than they expected.

The Blue Cross Blue Shield Association released a widely publicized report last month that said new enrollees under ObamaCare had 22 percent higher medical costs than people who received coverage through their employers.

“The industry is clearly setting the stage for bigger premium increases in 2017,” said Larry Levitt, an expert on the health law at the Kaiser Family Foundation.

The proposals for premium increases, which will be rolled out over the next couple of months, still have to be approved by state insurance commissioners. The ultimate impact on consumers will be hard to determine, as ObamaCare’s tax credits often soften the blow.

“Companies are either going to have to raise their prices significantly or drop out,” said Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), pointing to a poll from NPR that found a quarter of the public says the health law has personally hurt them.

“UnitedHealth has announced it is pulling out of the Obamacare exchanges,” one Senator wrote in a statement. “That’s the latest in a string of Obamacare failures that have led to American families losing their doctors, having few or no insurance options, and facing skyrocketing premiums and deductibles.”

“In almost every year I remember since 2013 started, there were projections of double-digit premium [increases] that turned out not to be correct,” said Chris Jennings, a former Obama White House adviser on healthcare reform. “Now, do I believe this year may be a little bit different? I think it could be.”

About 15 percent of ObamaCare enrollees do not receive a tax credit, so they would bear the full burden of price hikes, though they, like other enrollees, can shop around for the best deal.

State regulators may be forced to approve some hefty rate increases for next year, given the need for insurers to stop losing money.

*Modified from Hill.com, IBD.com, WSJ.com articles, and other online sources.

0

THE SELF EMPLOYED ALSO NEED BENEFITS

Are you one of the many individuals who has become self-employed either voluntarily or involuntarily due to the changes in today’s economy?

In the past if you voluntarily left your employer or were laid off, you would have been able to move to another company; however, because of economic changes in California, you may now be forced to become self-employed, classified as an independent contractor or “consultant” to survive financially.

In addition to the financial implications, the biggest shock is the realization that by leaving your former employer you have suddenly lost the safety net for you and your family of health insurance and related benefits previously provided by the company.

  • As a health insurance broker, a specific area of my focus is the self-employed who have left companies to work independently. My goal is to provide these individuals and their families with creative strategies to replicate, on an individual basis, the benefits once provided by their previous employers.

Over the next few weeks I will be focusing my newsletter, and my other publications, on the risks faced by the self-employed through the loss of company employee benefits. I intend to recommend specific strategies to reduce or eliminate these financial risks.

A few of the issues, and questions that I will address:

  • The risk of medical expenses caused by illness or accidents.

Health insurance policies are nothing more than financial instruments designed to mitigate medical financial risks.

Do you know how to tailor the four (Bronze, Silver, Gold, Platinum) health insurance plan categories to your specific needs?

  • The risk of large out of pocket financial requirements of health insurance policies.

Currently these amounts range from $4,000 to $6,850 for individuals, and $8,000 to $13,700 for families. In 2017 these amounts will increase to $7,150 and $14,300 respectively.

How will these amounts be paid, and by whom?

  • The risk of a direct loss of income by being unable to work for a period of time (or permanently) as the result of an illness or accident.

Health insurance only pays for the medical expenses; it is not designed to replace lost income.

What types of policies can be used to protect income, and how do insurance companies view the self-employed vs. W2 employees?

  • The risks of requiring skilled nursing, assisted living or other long term care arrangements caused by an illness or accident.

Can insurance policies be structured to pay these benefits, and still provide other benefits?

0

Obamacare Enrollees Sicker, Causing Premiums to Soar Again

A study finds that a larger portion of recent Obamacare enrollees are sicker and far more costly to cover. As a result, the insurance industry is seeking yet another series of premium hikes to cover the quickly rising costs.

According to The Washington Post, Obamacare enrollees in Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) had higher instances of diabetes, more propensity for heart disease, and had higher rates of depression than previous, pre-Obamacare members of the plan.

Newer enrollees who came into BCBS through the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) insurance marketplaces, commonly called Obamacare, caused costs to rise 22 percent on average more than plan members who received their insurance through an employer.

“Average monthly medical spending per member was $559 for individual enrollees in 2015, for example, versus $457 for group members,” the Post wrote.

The report is the best evidence to show why premiums have soared and why they are showing no signs of stopping since President Obama’s signature takeover of the nation’s healthcare insurance system was implemented.

Since insurance companies are no longer allowed to deny pre-existing conditions, payouts for medical services have wildly increased, and the study is likely to serve as a basis for the industry to submit its next wave of higher premiums.

Obamacare proponents say the skyrocketing medical costs were fully expected and that the law was written expecting the influx of young people forced to buy insurance to cover the higher costs of service to older, sicker enrollees.

But the bigger problem young people face is that they often have far less income to afford the much higher insurance costs they are now being forced to pay due to the passage of the ACA. Therefore many are not signing up and preferring to pay the tax penalties.

Because of these spiraling costs, people under 35 have lagged in signing up, compared to older ACA enrollees. And while it was recently reported that more young people had begun the enrollment process to avoid the tax penalties in the law, the numbers are still not balancing what is needed to pay the greater costs for the older, sicker plan members already enrolled.

“If participation among young adults had matched their share of the population, then 4.8 million young adults would have enrolled — but just 3.25 million selected plans.”

But even that 3.25 million is an inflated number because a large number of younger enrollees never completed signing up and did not end up paying for the new, more expensive healthcare policies.

*Modified from a WSJ.com and Washington Post articles, and other online sources

0

2016 OPEN ENROLLMENT IS COMING TO AN END

Have you taken advantage of Open Enrollment for individual health insurance for 2016?

If not, you have until January 31st to complete your enrollment in an ACA (Obamacare) compliant plan.

Open Enrollment will also give you the opportunity to change carriers or categories of plans (Bronze, Silver, Gold, and Platinum), even if you have already selected a plan that went into effect January 1st.

If you enroll on or before January 15th, your effective date will be February 1st. From January 16th until January 31st, your effective date will be March 1st.

After January 31st, you will not be able to enroll in an ACA approved plan until next year’s Open Enrollment.

The only exception to this rule is the occurrence of a “qualifying event”, which will allow you to enroll in coverage outside of Open Enrollment.

For those living in California the most common “qualifying events” are losing employer based group coverage, marriage, divorce, or the birth of a child. You will have 60 days from the date of the event to enroll in a new individual policy. If you miss the 60-day window you will be required to wait to enroll in a plan until the next Open Enrollment.

If you fail to enroll in a plan for 2016, the penalty for not being covered has increased. For an individual it’s THE GREATER of $695 or 2.5% of household income, not to exceed the average national cost of a Bronze plan of approximately $2700.

For a family calculation of the penalty is bit more complicated: $695 for adults, and $347.50 per child up to $2,085 OR 2.5% of household income, up to a maximum of approximately $13,300, WHICHEVER IS GREATER.

If you miss Open Enrollment you can still obtain short term medical coverage, hospital coverage plans, and other types of coverage for accidents or other specific occurrences.

However, these plans do not serve as a substitute for ACA approved plans, which means you still will be subject to the Obamacare penalty for lack of proper coverage.

0

More People Turn to Faith-Based Groups for Health Coverage

In a trend that could challenge the stability of the Affordable Care Act, a growing number of people are turning to health-care ministries to cover their medical expenses instead of buying traditional insurance according to a Wall Street Journal article published last week on their wsj.com website.

The ministries, which operate outside the insurance system and aren’t regulated by states, provide a health-care cost-sharing arrangement among people with similarly held beliefs. Their membership growth has been spurred by an Affordable Care Act provision allowing participants in eligible ministries to avoid fines for not buying insurance.

But now, some insurance commissioners are concerned that the ministries could put consumers at risk if bills aren’t paid. The ministries aren’t overseen by state commissioners, which generally guard against unfair practices and ensure solvency.

  • Ministry officials say they aren’t offering insurance, don’t guarantee claims will be paid, and don’t need to be regulated. The nonprofits are well managed, according to ministry officials, with third-party audits and a sterling history of sharing members’ claims.
  • Ministries generally don’t allow members to sue and require disagreements to be settled by arbitration and mediation.
  • Most ministries don’t always share bills for certain pre-existing conditions, whereas the ACA requires insurers to cover anyone regardless of their past or current medical history.

State regulators also say health ministries disrupt the insurance market because they tend to attract healthier consumers, siphoning them from commercial plans that can be left with sicker or older customers. Insurance commissioners in some states have moved to shut down the ministries’ state operations.

Many of the estimated 50 health-care ministries in the U.S. are small operations, and some churches have their own programs limited to parishioners. There are several large Christian ministries, and at least two other ministries open to people regardless of specific religious faith.

Members typically must abide by Biblical principles such as not having sex outside of marriage, and may have to sign a statement of religious faith.

Some consumers say they joined ministries to avoid rising deductibles and premiums on the health law’s exchanges, and to be free from the law’s penalty, which starts at $695 for 2016.

Consumers generally pay a set monthly amount that goes into a general account or directly to others who have eligible medical bill. They can also submit their own eligible bills to be shared by other members. In some ministries, members make contributions directly to others—and tuck gifts, personal cards and get-well wishes into the envelopes. Preventive care in some cases isn’t covered.

There have been lawsuits by ministry members against a cost-sharing ministry, claiming particular medical bills that should have been shared were not. The cases were ultimately settled or resolved through arbitration.

*Modified from a wsj.com article and other online sources.

0

2016 OPEN ENROLLMENT FOR INDIVIDUAL HEALTH INSURANCE

Open Enrollment for 2016 individual plans will begin on Monday November 1st, and continue until January 31, 2016. During this period of time, you will be able to change insurance carriers and your individual plan category (Bronze, Silver, Gold, Platinum).

All carriers have made minor changes to their individual plans based upon Obamacare mandates. There are low or moderate increases in premiums for plans offered through the Covered California State Exchange (for those who need a federal premium assistance subsidy), and for Off Exchange plans for those that do not qualify for the subsidy.

Based upon review of next year’s plans, only Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of California will have PPOs available in every county in California. Both carriers have increased for 2016 the number of providers that make up their individual plan provider networks. In addition, both carrier’s individual plans will have access to the full Blue Cross / Blue Shield nationwide provider network.

Anthem and Blue Shield have added new Bronze and Silver plans available for Off Exchange enrollment. These plans have unique features, and lower non subsidized premiums than On Exchange (Covered CA) plans.

If you choose Covered California in order to obtain a federal premium assistance subsidy, you need to begin the enrollment process immediately, because of the paperwork required to prove your anticipated 2016 income level.

For Off Exchange enrollment, you have adequate time to review options. Your application must be submitted by December 15th to have a January effective date.

If you have questions regarding Off Exchange plans and enrollment, please call me at (626) 797-4618 or email me at john@healthinsbrokers.com.

0

Health Insurers Seek Hefty Rate Boosts

Major insurers in some states are proposing hefty rate boosts for plans sold under the federal health law, setting the stage for an intense debate this summer over the law’s impact.

One state, New Mexico is asking for an average jump of 51.6% in premiums for 2016. Insurance carriers in several states have proposed 36.3%, 30.4%, and 25% rate increases. In dozens of other larger states carriers have applied for increases averaging 10%.

  • Insurers in California have not announced the percentage increase in their rates; however they have begun the process of filing their rates with state insurance regulators.

All insurance carriers cite high medical costs incurred by people newly enrolled under the Affordable Care Act.

Under that law, insurers file proposed rates to their local regulator and, in most cases, to the federal government. Some states have begun making the filings public, as they prepare to review the requests in coming weeks.

  • Insurers say their proposed rates reflect the revenue they need to pay claims, now that they have had time to analyze their experience with the law’s requirement that they offer the same rates to everyone—regardless of medical history.

Health-cost growth has slowed to historic lows in recent years, a fact consumer groups are expected to bring up during rate-review debates. Insurers say they face significant pent-up demand for health care from the newly enrolled, including for expensive drugs.

  • “This year, health plans have a full year of claims data to understand the health needs showing enrollees are generally older and often managing multiple chronic conditions,” said a spokeswoman for America’s Health Insurance Plans, an industry group. “Premiums reflect the rising cost of providing care to individuals and families, and the explosion in prescription and specialty drug prices is a significant factor.”

The federal government subsidizes premiums for some consumers, based on income, and the validity of those subsidies in most of the country is the subject of a lawsuit the Supreme Court is expected to decide in late June.

  • The filings from insurers are based on the assumption that those subsidies remain in place.

Obama administration officials weathered a storm as some younger, healthier consumers saw their premiums jump when the law rolled out, but were also able to point to modest premiums overall as insurers focused on other ways to keep costs down, such as narrow provider networks.

For 2015 insurance plans, when insurers had only a little information about the health of their new customers, big insurers tended to make increases of less than 10%, while smaller insurers tried offering lower rates to build market share.

Modified from a WSJ.com article

 

0

44% of Covered California customers report difficulty paying premiums

A new survey shows that 44% of Covered California policyholders find it difficult to pay their monthly premiums for Obamacare coverage. And a similar percentage of uninsured Californians say the high cost of coverage is the main reason they go without health insurance.

The issue of just how much people can afford will loom large as the state exchange prepares to negotiate with health insurers over next year’s rates.

  • Many analysts are predicting bigger premium increases for 2016 in California and across the country. Insurers have more details on the medical costs of enrollees, and some federal programs that help protect health plans from unpredictable claims will be winding down.

This latest pulse on consumer attitudes is drawn from a Kaiser Family Foundation survey of 4,555 Californians from September to December 2014. It examined the experiences of people in Covered California, Medi-Cal, other private coverage and the uninsured.

  • Forty-four percent of exchange policyholders surveyed said it’s somewhat or very difficult to afford their premiums. That’s compared with 25% of adults who had employer-based or other private health insurance.

Peter Lee, executive director of Covered California, acknowledged that many Californians find it hard to fit health insurance premiums into their household budget, even when they qualify for generous federal subsidies.

“If you are making $25,000 a year that $70 premium is still a struggle,” Lee said. “The Affordable Care Act is providing nobody with a free lunch. This issue of making healthcare affordable is not easy.”

  • Anthem Blue Cross, Kaiser Permanente and other health insurers have submitted their proposed 2016 rates for individual policies to Covered California, and negotiations are expected to begin next month.

The final statewide rates should be announced in July, Lee said. For 2015, the average rate increase was 4.2%.

Modified from a LATimes.com article.

0

After Expanding Under Obamacare, This 123-Year-Old Insurance Company (Assurant) Is Closing Its Doors

After expanding to do business on the Affordable Care Act’s exchanges last year, a Wisconsin-based health insurance company founded in 1892 has announced it will close its doors.

Assurant Inc. announced last week one of its subsidiaries, Assurant Health, an insurance company, will either be sold or shuttered after losing tens of millions of dollars this year. The decision comes 18 months after the implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), and industry watchers argue Assurant Health’s end can be attributed to the new health care law.

  • In California, Assurant’s Time Insurance Company subsidiary began writing policies under ACA rules in January of 2014. Individuals enrolled in these medical plans were able to use the Aetna nationwide provider network. The carrier began the process of withdrawing from California in late December of 2014.   

“The health and employee benefits business segments possess differentiated capabilities in their respective markets, but we do not believe they can meet our return targets at the pace we require,” Alan Colberg, president of Assurant Inc., said in a statement. “While this is a difficult decision, we believe they would be strong assets for new owners that are focused more exclusively on health care and employee benefits.”

In a letter to its shareholders, Assurant Health said it lost money because of a reduction in recoveries under Obamacare’s risk mitigation programs and increased claims on the health care law’s 2015 policies.

Before Obamacare’s implementation, Assurant Health would underwrite its customer’s policies, which gave the company a competitive edge. The process involves adjusting the cost of a consumer’s premium based on factors such as medical history and age.

The Affordable Care Act, though, prohibited medical underwriting, and advocates touted the law as easing access to health insurance for people with pre-existing conditions.

In addition to offering insurance on exchanges in more than a dozen states, Assurant Health also sold plans to individuals in 41 states and small businesses in 34 states, insuring close to 1 million people.

Despite the company’s efforts to reach more consumers, Assurant Health saw a $64 million loss in 2014. During the first three months of 2015, the company reported operating losses of $80 million to $90 million.

*Modified from The Daily Signal article, and Assurant press release.

0

Many Uninsured Choose Penalty Over Enrollment Offer Under Health Law

Tax preparers, and several surveys find tepid response to the Obama administration’s effort to boost sign-ups. A special enrollment period to obtain health insurance for millions of uninsured people who owe a tax penalty under the Affordable Care Act is off to a slow start.

About 11.7 million people have already signed up on state and federal exchanges this year, though not all of them have yet paid premiums.

The health law requires most Americans to have insurance or pay a fine at tax time. The open enrollment period under the health law ended Feb. 15, but the Obama administration said it would allow people who discover they owe a fine to sign up for coverage through April, at the end of the tax season.

The special enrollment period applies to people who have to pay a penalty for going without coverage in 2014, and also face a penalty in 2015. They must pay any penalty they owe for not having coverage but can use the special enrollment period to obtain coverage and not generate any more fines.

  • It is still early, since the special enrollment period launched Sunday, but research also suggests that many people who lack health insurance will pay the penalty and not get covered this year.
  • Only 12% of uninsured people would buy policies if informed of the penalty, according to a survey of 3,000 adults polled through Feb. 24 by McKinsey & Co.’s Center for U.S. Health System Reform.
  • At H&R Block Inc., “our analysis indicates that a significant percentage of taxpayers whose household members were not covered for at least a portion of 2014 are opting” to pay the penalty, said a vice president of health-care enrollment services at the tax-preparation firm.
  • “It was a good PR move and aligns enrollment with tax season, but we’re not seeing a massive rush,” said a spokesman with Jackson Hewitt Tax Service Inc. “It’s been pretty unremarkable.”

A retired employee of United Parcel Service, Inc. found out he will pay a $250 penalty for going without insurance. He said won’t take advantage of the special enrollment period because it is cheaper for him to pay out-of-pocket for health care than to buy insurance on the exchange.

He said he shopped on the exchange but would have to pay $400 a month for a plan with a $6,000 deductible.

“I think it’s wrong I have to pay the penalty… “But it beats paying more than $10,000 a year.”

Modified from a wsj.com article, and other online sources

0